We provide economic analysis related to injunction requests to halt the production or sale of an infringing product or technology. Our professionals have served as consulting and testifying experts in permanent and preliminary injunction proceedings on issues related to the standards set forth in eBay v. MercExchange such as irreparable harm, adequacy of monetary damages, balance of the burdens, and public interest.
- Testified on behalf of Samsung in Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities and Components Thereof, an ITC investigation involving standard-essential patents (SEPs).
- Testified on behalf of Samsung in Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Tablet Computers, Media Players and Televisions, and Components Thereof.
- Submitted a declaration and testified on behalf of Nest Labs in Allure Energy, Inc. v. Nest Labs, Inc., a patent infringement proceeding, assessing whether a preliminary injunction against the defendant should be granted.
- In Teva v. Amgen, supported testifying expert working with Amgen Inc., which sought a permanent injunction to prevent Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. from introducing its infringing drug, Neutroval, to the US market prior to the expiration of Amgen’s patents.
- Provided written report, deposition, and courtroom testimony on behalf of Amgen in Amgen v. F. Hoffman-La Roche to advise the court considering whether to grant a permanent injunction against Roche’s sales and marketing of a product that infringes Amgen’s patents.
- In Applied Medical v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, on behalf of Applied Medical, investigated economic issues associated with the Court’s consideration of injunctive relief concerning allegations of false advertising in markets for laparoscopic medical devices.