Main Menu
Photo of David  Barth, PhD

Summary

David Barth brings over 20 years of experience to collusion and monopolization cases. He specializes in evaluating firms’ behavior and market outcomes in liability and damages analyses. David loves working with clients on case strategy, digging into data and documents to develop expert opinions, and distilling economic concepts and analyses into clear, compelling testimony for judges and juries. He has testified in federal court. He leads project teams, working with counsel and testifying experts through all phases of litigation.

Education

PhD, Economics, Northwestern University

MA, Economics, Northwestern University

BA, Economics (with distinction and departmental honors), Stanford University

Selected Work

Selected Experience

Monopolization and vertical restraints

  • Provided expert testimony on behalf of the plaintiff in Pacific Surf Designs v. WhiteWater West Industries, Ltd. et al., an alleged monopolization case involving sheet wave machines.
  • In United States et al. v. Google LLC, in which Google allegedly monopolized markets for publisher ad servers, ad exchanges, and advertiser ad networks for open-web display advertising, supported multiple testifying experts on behalf of the Department of Justice (DOJ).
  • In United States et al. v. Google, LLC, a civil antitrust lawsuit in which the DOJ alleged that Google acted anticompetitively to maintain its monopolies in the markets for general search services, search advertising, and general search text adverstising, supported testifying experts on behalf of the DOJ.
  • Supported liability and damages expert on behalf of the plaintiff in Cedar AI Inc. v. Railcar Management, LLC, et al. regarding antitrust counterclaims to intellectual property litigation alleging monopolization and exclusionary conduct in the market for transportation management systems for short line railroads. 
  • In Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm, an alleged monopolization case, supported testifying expert on behalf of the Federal Trade Commission.
  • Provided support for expert testimony on behalf of American Express in its litigation with the Department of Justice and on subsequent related matters.
  • In Novell, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., supported testifying experts on behalf of the plaintiff regarding issues associated with liability, causation, and damages.
  • In United States and State of Texas v. United Regional Health Care System, on behalf of the Department of Justice, supported analysis of the competitive effects of United Regional's exclusionary contracts with health insurers.

Price-fixing and horizontal agreements

Other

News & Insights

Jump to Page

We use cookies to optimize the performance of this site and give you the best user experience. By clicking "Accept," you agree to our use of cookies.

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.